Why Issuers Need an Independent Financial Advisor
Bond/Note Pricing – When an issuer is
pricing a transaction, the investment banker or underwriter may provide
a pricing scale prior to the actual
bond sale. An independent financial advisor has the ability to make
sure that
the pricing scale is “on market” and that the issuer is selling
its bonds/notes at a market price.
Swap Pricing – The Pennsylvania
Local Government Unit Debt Act (Act 23) was amended in September
of 2003 to specifically allow Pennsylvania
municipalities to enter into derivative transactions (interest rate
swaps). Under Act 23 any municipality entering into a derivative
transaction is
required to hire an independent financial advisor to make sure that
the issuer is receiving a fair market price. Act 23 only governs
municipalities in Pennsylvania. Many times municipalities in other
states, as well as Higher
Education
and Healthcare issuers enter into swaps without hiring an independent
financial advisor. An issuer should always have an independent firm
verify the pricing of a derivative
transaction regardless if it is expressly required by law. Interest
rate swaps are complex transactions where the pricing is not transparent.
Federal
regulatory agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) are starting to focus
on derivative transactions.
Transaction Structuring – An independent
financial advisor can assist an issuer in structuring a financial
transaction that meets the needs of
the issuer, preserves maximum flexibility and allows the issuer to
receive a fair market price. The optimal financial structure for the
issuer may not be
the most profitable for the firm that is selling and marketing the
transaction. As an independent financial advisor, we work for the issuer
alone and do not face the conflict of interest inherent in a relationship where structuring advice is provided to the issuer by transaction counter-party.
Regulatory Agencies - The IRS plans to be
more active in reviewing transactions
in the state and local government and healthcare industries. IRS
examinations and audits can have a significant effect on an issuer’s
ability to access the capital markets, result in substantial financial
penalties and
ultimately the loss of tax-exemption. The IRS is targeting transactions
that are “banker-driven” – transactions where the investment
banker or underwriter structures, prices, and sells the bonds without
any independent verification on the pricing of the deal. An independent
financial
advisor provides issuers with an additional level of security and
due diligence that the transaction is properly priced and structured.
MSRB Rule G-23 - The Municipal Securities
Rulemaking Board states that there is an inherent conflict of interest
when an investment bank or underwriting firm acts as
both a financial advisor
and an underwriter or broker-dealer to an issuer on the same transaction.
The Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board has enacted Rule G-23 to provide disclosure
and prevent this type of conflict. Below are some excerpts from
Rule G-23:
Underwriting Activities - No broker, dealer, or municipal securities
dealer that has a financial advisory relationship with respect
to a new issue of municipal securities shall acquire as principal
either alone or
as a participant in a syndicate or other similar account formed
for
the purpose of purchasing, directly or indirectly, from the issuer
all or any
portion of such issue, or act as agent for the issuer in arranging
the placement of such issue, unless
(i) if such issue is to be sold by the issuer on a negotiated basis,
(A) the financial advisory relationship with respect to such
issue has been terminated in writing and at or after such termination
the issuer has expressly consented
in writing to such acquisition or participation, as principal or agent,
in
the purchase of the securities on a negotiated basis;
(B) the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer has
expressly disclosed in writing to the issuer at or before
such termination that
there may be a
conflict of interest in changing from the capacity of financial advisor
to purchaser of
or placement agent for the securities with respect to which the financial
advisory relationship exists and the issuer has expressly
acknowledged in writing to
the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer receipt of such
disclosure; and
(C) the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer
has expressly disclosed in writing to the issuer at or before
such termination
the source and anticipated
amount of all remuneration to the broker, dealer, or municipal
securities dealer with respect to such issue in addition
to the compensation
referred to in section
(c) of this MSRB rule, and the issuer has expressly acknowledged
in writing to the broker, dealer, or municipal securities dealer
receipt of
such disclosure;
or
(ii) if such issue is to be sold by the issuer at competitive
bid, the issuer has expressly consented in writing prior to the
bid
to such acquisition
or
participation.
Source: Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board website (www.msrb.org)
|
 |
 |